Pragmatic language goals for kindergarten
By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated
Short answer
A kindergarten pragmatic goal targets how a child uses communication with others in play and routines, in any mode. Example: during center time, Ivy will add a line that fits a peer's pretend play in 4 of 5 opportunities, up from 1 of 5. Count real interactions, and never require eye contact, a quiet body or forced greetings.
Kindergarten is full of social communication: asking to join, saying no, sharing news at morning meeting and fixing it when a friend misunderstood. The 24 goals below are written for those moments, grouped into six areas: saying what you need, starting and ending interactions, play, repair, classroom talk, and understanding others.
Each goal has a condition, a baseline, a criterion with a denominator and the measure, plus its template link. Numbers are illustrations, not benchmarks. For other kindergarten speech areas, see speech IEP goals for kindergarten. The speech therapy IEP goals pillar covers every area.
Goals that respect how young children communicate
A five-year-old who flaps, hums, looks away or talks about trains for ten minutes is communicating in their own way. Goals that require eye contact, "whole body listening" or a quiet body teach children to hide their natural style, and they do not make communication more successful. Write goals for what makes interactions work for both partners: being understood, saying no safely, joining play and fixing mix-ups.
ASHA describes social communication as using language in social settings, adjusting to the partner and repairing breakdowns, and supports measuring it in the child's natural routines.[1] For autistic children, ASHA's guidance centers the child's interests and natural settings.[2] Accept speech, signs, pictures, devices and gestures as equal.
How to choose a kindergarten pragmatic goal
Watch two settings: free play or centers, and a structured group such as morning meeting. Note what the child does to start, keep and end interactions, and where things break down. Ask the family what they see at home.
| What you see | Sub-skill to target | Measurement method |
|---|---|---|
| Hits or grabs when a peer takes a toy | Saying stop or no safely | Opportunities in play |
| Covers ears and leaves during loud activities | Asking for a sensory tool or break | Opportunities in noisy routines |
| Plays next to peers, not with them | Joining and adding to play | Opportunities at centers |
| Talks to a peer who is not listening | Getting a listener's attention | Opportunities with peers |
| Gets upset when a peer misunderstands | Repair: say it again or show | Repairs out of breakdowns |
| Answers off topic at morning meeting | Answering before adding a new idea | Turns on topic out of total |
| Unsure why a friend is crying | Reading feelings and situations | Items correct in scenarios |
Saying what you need
These goals come first because they keep the child safe and reduce distress. A child who can say no or ask for headphones needs less adult rescue.
- When a peer or adult offers something she does not want, Ivy will say no with a reason or an alternative ("No, I want blocks") using words, signs or a device in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 1 of 5. Measure: opportunities. Template.
- During loud activities such as assemblies or music, Ivy will ask for headphones or a quiet spot in 4 of 5 opportunities across 4 weeks. Baseline: 0 of 5, covers ears and runs. Template.
- When a peer takes a toy or comes too close, Leo will tell the peer to stop with a word, sign or picture in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 1 of 5, pushes. Template.
- When an activity is ending and he is not done, Leo will ask for more time in 3 of 4 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 0 of 4. Template.
Weak: "Ivy will use her words instead of acting out." Measurable: Goal 1 above. It names the situation, the modes accepted and the count.
The break requests topic and the noise sensitivity topic have related goals across areas.
Starting and ending interactions
- Before talking to a peer who is busy, Mia will get their attention by saying their name, tapping their arm or waiting next to them in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 sessions. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.
- When a familiar adult or peer greets her, Mia will respond in any way she chooses (word, wave, sign, device) in 4 of 5 opportunities across 2 weeks. Baseline: 2 of 5. Template.
- During centers, Sam will start a conversation with a peer about a shared interest (such as dinosaurs) in 3 of 4 opportunities across 3 observations. Baseline: 0 of 4. Template.
- When he is finished playing or talking, Sam will end the interaction with a closing ("Bye," "I'm done," a wave) in 4 of 5 opportunities. Baseline: 1 of 5, walks away. Template.
Weak: "Mia will greet peers appropriately with eye contact." Measurable: Goal 2 above. Any response counts, and the goal measures connection, not a specific look or phrase.
Play and peer talk goals
Play is where kindergarteners make friends. Goals here measure joining and keeping play going, at the child's own interests.
- During pretend play at centers, Ada will add a line that fits the peer's play (such as "The baby is hungry!") in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 observations. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.
- During shared play with one peer, Ada will keep the play going for 4 or more back-and-forth turns in 3 of 4 play sessions. Baseline: 1 to 2 turns. Template.
- During centers, Noah will share a comment with a peer about what they are building or drawing 3 times per 15-minute center across 3 observations. Baseline: 0 per center. Template.
- During a small-group shared book, Noah will add a related comment ("I have a dog too") in 3 of 4 books across 2 weeks. Baseline: 0 of 4. Template.
Weak: "Ada will play nicely with peers." Measurable: Goal 2 above. It counts turns in a set kind of play.
The turn-taking topic and the friendship skills topic collect related goals. Parallel play is fine for many children. Write a joining goal only when the child shows interest in peers.
Repair goals for young children
Repair is a lifelong skill. A child who is hard to understand, or who uses few words, benefits most.
- When a partner misunderstands his message, Eli will repeat it, say it another way or show the item in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 sessions. Baseline: 1 of 5, gives up. Template.
- When a peer gets his message wrong (brings the wrong toy), Eli will correct them ("No, the red one") in 3 of 4 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 0 of 4. Template.
- When a partner asks "Which one?", Lily will add a describing detail (color, size, place) in 8 of 10 opportunities across 3 sessions. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template.
- When she does not understand a direction or comment, Lily will ask a question or say "I don't know what you mean" in 3 of 4 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 0 of 4. Template.
Weak: "Eli will speak more clearly so peers understand." Measurable: Goal 1 above. It teaches a strategy the child can use now.
Classroom talk goals
- During morning meeting, Ruby will share one news item with at least 2 details in 4 of 5 meetings across 2 weeks. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.
- After a classmate shares at morning meeting, Ruby will ask the classmate one question about it in 3 of 4 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 0 of 4. Template.
- When the teacher asks a question during group time, Omar will answer it before adding a new idea in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 observations. Baseline: 2 of 5. Template.
- When the teacher gives an indirect request ("Can you close the door?" or "It's cleanup time"), Omar will act on it in 4 of 5 opportunities across 2 weeks. Baseline: 2 of 5. Template.
Weak: "Omar will stay on topic in group." Measurable: Goal 3 above. It defines what on topic means and how often it is counted.
Goal 3 lets Omar keep his new idea. He learns the order, not that his idea is unwelcome.
Understanding others
- Given 10 photos of children's faces and body cues in context, Grace will name the likely feeling (happy, sad, mad, scared, surprised) for 8 of 10 across 2 probes. Baseline: 4 of 10. Template.
- Given 10 short spoken or acted scenarios, Grace will say why a child might feel that way for 7 of 10 on 3 consecutive probes. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template.
- When the teacher is busy with another student, Ben will decide whether his message can wait and either wait or say it is urgent in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.
- When an adult asks what happened after a conflict, Ben will tell his side with who and what happened in 3 of 4 opportunities. Baseline: 0 of 4, shuts down. Template.
Weak: "Grace will show empathy." Measurable: Goal 2 above. It names the task and a criterion.
Use photos of real children in context, not cartoon faces alone. Feelings show up in many ways, and an autistic child's own expressions may not match the pictures. That is a difference, not an error to fix.
How to measure kindergarten pragmatic goals
- Opportunities fit almost every goal here. Decide what counts in advance (each time a peer takes a toy, each morning meeting). The teacher or para can tally on the opportunity data sheet.
- Frequency fits comment and turn goals in a set block. The frequency data sheet works for a 15-minute center.
- Item probes fit feelings and scenario goals. Use 10 items and change them each probe; record on the accuracy data sheet.
Probe every 2 to 4 weeks and graph the results, so you can see the trend before a report is due.[3] Data from the classroom matters more than speech-room data for these goals.
Short-term objectives for pragmatic goals
Step from adult partner, to one peer with adult support, to peers in centers. For the pretend play goal: by the first report, 4 of 5 opportunities with an adult play partner; by the second, with one peer and an adult nearby; by the third, at centers with peers and no adult prompt. The short-term objectives guide has the format.
Adapting by profile
| Profile | Adjust the goal | Example change |
|---|---|---|
| Uses AAC or few words | Prestored messages for stop, more and my turn | Says stop with a device in 4 of 5 chances |
| Autistic child with strong interests | Use the interest as the topic | Starts talk about trains with a peer |
| Anxious or very quiet child | Smaller groups, nonverbal options first | Shares news by showing a picture |
| Learning English | Accept the home language with peers who share it | Joins play in either language |
| Speech is hard to understand | Pair with a repair goal | Shows the item when not understood |
For more early social goals, see social skills goal examples and IEP goals for kindergarten. The K to 2 IEP goals page and the pragmatic language goals page list templates. The goal checker flags vague wording.
Frequently asked questions
What are pragmatic language skills in kindergarten?
They are the ways a child uses communication with others: asking, saying no, joining play, taking turns in talk, fixing misunderstandings and sharing news. Any mode counts, including signs, pictures and devices.
Should a kindergarten social goal require eye contact?
No. Eye contact is not needed to listen or connect, and many autistic children find it uncomfortable. Measure outcomes instead: did the child join the play, get their message across or fix a misunderstanding.
Who collects data on kindergarten pragmatic goals?
Usually the teacher or para during centers and meetings, with the SLP probing in sessions. Give classroom staff a simple tally sheet and agree on what counts as an opportunity before you start.
Use it in IEP Atlas
- Pragmatic language goals (speech language)
- Pragmatics in the IEP glossary
- Conversation skills goal hub
- Turn-taking goal hub
- K 2 IEP goals
- IEP goal checker
Related guides
- Speech therapy IEP goals: examples by area
- Speech IEP goals for kindergarten
- Pragmatic language goals for high school students
- Social skills IEP goal examples
- IEP goals for topic maintenance
Sources
- Social Communication Disorder, ASHA
- Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorder, ASHA
- Progress Monitoring: Data & Goal Setting, National Center on Intensive Intervention
Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.