Skip to content

Math IEP goals for Intellectual Disability

209 math templates across 9 skills: measurement, time & money, number sense, math problem solving, addition & subtraction, geometry & spatial reasoning, patterns, data & graphs, fractions, multiplication & division, algebra & equations. Each opens in the builder with a matching data sheet.

209 templates · 9 skills · Pre-K, K–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–12 · How we write and review goals

Top skills

The 8 most relevant skills, with sample goals. Numbers are illustrative; set targets from the student's own baseline.

  • K-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Tell time to the hour and half hour on an analog clock

    Telling time to the hour and half hour

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 analog clock faces showing times to the hour and half hour, the student will say or write the time shown on each clock independently with at least 90% accuracy on clock readings, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize
  • K-2, 3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Tell time to the nearest five minutes and minute

    Telling time to five minutes and one minute

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 analog clock faces showing times to the nearest five minutes, the student will write the time shown on each clock in digital form independently with at least 90% accuracy on clock readings, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize

See all 75 measurement, time & money goals

Number Sense Math

36 goals
  • PK, K-2Opportunities

    Count a set of objects and state how many

    Counting objects with one-to-one correspondence

    By the annual IEP review date, when presented with a set of 5 to 20 objects arranged in a line or scattered on the table, the student will count the objects by touching or moving each one once and state the total independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • K-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Compare whole numbers with <, >, and =

    Comparing whole numbers

    By the annual IEP review date, given 20 pairs of two- and three-digit numbers, the student will write the symbol <, >, or = between each pair of numbers independently with at least 90% accuracy on number comparisons, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize

See all 65 number sense goals

  • 3-5, 6-8, 9-12Percent accuracy

    Find totals and determine if there is enough money

    Money problems with a calculator

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 shopping scenarios with 2 to 4 priced items and a set amount of money, the student will use a calculator to find the total cost and state whether there is enough money independently with at least 80% accuracy on shopping scenarios, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize
  • PK, K-2Opportunities

    Act out a story problem with objects

    Acting out story problems

    By the annual IEP review date, given a spoken one-step story problem within 10 and a set of matching objects (for example, toy cars for a story about cars), the student will show the story with the objects and state the answer independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize

See all 70 math problem solving goals

  • K-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Add and subtract two-digit numbers with regrouping

    Two-digit addition and subtraction with regrouping

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 two-digit addition and subtraction problems that require regrouping, the student will write the correct sum or difference for each problem independently with at least 80% accuracy on two-digit regrouping problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly work samples, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize
  • PK, K-2Opportunities

    Combine or take away objects to find the total

    Joining and separating sets with objects

    By the annual IEP review date, given two sets of 1 to 5 objects and the direction to put them together and tell how many, the student will combine the sets, count all the objects once, and state the total independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize

See all 60 addition & subtraction goals

  • PKOpportunities

    Match identical shapes

    Matching shapes

    By the annual IEP review date, given a shape card and a choice of 3 shape cards, one of which is identical, the student will place the shape card on the identical shape independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • PK, K-2Percent accuracy

    Point to and name basic two-dimensional shapes

    Identifying basic 2D shapes

    By the annual IEP review date, given a field of 4 shapes (circle, square, triangle, rectangle) and the name of one shape, the student will point to the named shape independently with at least 90% accuracy on shape identifications, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize

See all 45 geometry & spatial reasoning goals

  • PK, K-2Opportunities

    Copy and extend a two-part repeating pattern

    Copying and extending AB patterns

    By the annual IEP review date, given a model of an AB pattern made with 6 to 8 colored cubes or shapes and a supply of matching pieces, the student will build a copy of the pattern piece by piece directly under the model independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • PK, K-2Opportunities

    Sort objects by one attribute and then by two

    Sorting and classifying objects

    By the annual IEP review date, given 12 to 16 objects that vary in color, size and type and a stated sorting rule, the student will sort every object into the correct group for the stated attribute independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize

See all 40 patterns, data & graphs goals

Fractions Math

14 goals
  • 3-5Percent accuracy

    Name the fraction shown by an area or set model

    Naming fractions from models

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 area or set models showing fractions with denominators of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8, the student will write the fraction that names the shaded part of each model independently with at least 80% accuracy on fraction models, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize
  • K-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Divide a shape into halves, thirds or fourths

    Partitioning shapes into equal parts

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 outlines of rectangles and circles and the direction to divide each into halves, thirds or fourths, the student will draw lines that divide each shape into the stated number of equal parts and shade one part independently with at least 85% accuracy on partitioned shapes, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize

See all 55 fractions goals

  • K-2, 3-5Opportunities

    Model multiplication with arrays or equal groups

    Multiplication concepts (arrays and equal groups)

    By the annual IEP review date, when given a multiplication expression with factors to 5 (for example, 3 × 4), the student will build the matching array or equal groups with counters and state the product independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8, 9-12Percent accuracy

    Use a calculator to solve multiplication and division problems

    Calculator use for multiplication and division

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 multi-digit multiplication and division problems written as equations, the student will enter each problem into a calculator in the correct order and record the answer independently with at least 90% accuracy on calculator problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize

See all 55 multiplication & division goals

All 9 skills

Every skill with goals for this group, by area. The number is how many of its goals are tagged here.

Number sense, operations, fractions, and problem solving. Goals for students with an intellectual disability focus on skills that carry into daily life: functional academics, routines, communication, self-care, and community participation. Task-analysis checklists and opportunity data make small, real steps visible.

Matching data sheets

Each goal above links to the blank sheet built for its measure. These are the sheets this set of goals uses:

Frequently asked questions

What kinds of goals fit students with an intellectual disability?

Functional academics (money, time, reading signs and schedules), daily living and self-care routines, functional communication, school and community independence, and vocational readiness for older students. Academic goals are written at the student's instructional level.

How do task-analysis goals work?

The routine is broken into ordered steps, and the data sheet records which steps the student completes independently. The criterion is a number of steps (for example, 9 of 10 steps) across several sessions.

How are math goals measured for students with intellectual disability?

With accuracy on problem sets, digits correct per minute on fact probes, and percent of word problems solved with a defined strategy. The goal states whether tools such as number lines or calculators are part of the condition.

Should math goals be timed?

Rate measures suit fact fluency; accuracy measures suit computation and problem solving. If timing is a barrier for the student, choose accuracy with a fixed item set.

IEP Atlas Pro

Turn these goals into progress reports

Pro tracks every goal on your caseload and drafts the report for you. Free for 14 days.

Count trials, prompts, and minutes live in the session; the graph and trend line draw themselves; progress reports are drafted from your data.