Final consonant deletion IEP goals: 24 examples
By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated
Short answer
A final consonant deletion goal targets the ending sounds a child leaves off, at a set level, with a criterion that has a denominator. Example: given 20 untrained picture words ending in a stop or /s/, Nia will say the final consonant in 16 of 20 words across 2 consecutive probes. Pick the level from the child's probe.
Final consonant deletion is the pattern where a child drops the last consonant of a word: "ba" for bag, "ca" for cat, "bu" for bus. It removes a lot of meaning at once, because many short words differ only in their ending. These 24 goals move from hearing the ending to using it in play and class. Each has a condition, a baseline, a criterion and a link to its template. The numbers are illustrations.
The articulation goals examples pillar covers single sounds. This page treats the ending as a pattern across many sounds, which is usually the faster route.
When final consonant deletion needs a goal
Most children produce final consonants early in the preschool years, and many of the sounds involved (/p/, /b/, /m/, /n/, /t/, /d/) are among the earliest consonants children master.[1] A child who still leaves off many endings at age 3 and a half or 4 is usually hard to understand, and that is the main reason to act. ASHA's speech sound disorders page describes this kind of pattern-based error as phonological rather than motor.[2]
Check two things before you write the goal:
- Dialect and home language. Many languages, including Spanish and Vietnamese, allow only a few consonants at the ends of words. A child learning English may drop endings that the home language does not have. Score against the home language patterns, and look for the pattern in both languages before calling it a disorder.[3]
- Which endings are missing. Some children drop every ending. Others keep nasals (/m/, /n/) and drop stops and fricatives. Sort a probe by sound class so the goal starts where the child is closest.
How to choose the right goal
| What you see now | Sub-skill to target | Measurement method |
|---|---|---|
| Does not notice when an ending is missing | Hearing final sounds | Opportunities: 10 judgments |
| Says the ending only after a model | Imitating endings with a cue | Opportunities: 20 imitated words |
| Drops endings in single words | Final sounds in words | Percent of 20 untrained words |
| Endings present in words, gone in phrases | Phrases, songs and sentences | Percent of 20 phrases |
| Endings present with the SLP, gone in play | Play, class and peers | Percent of target words in a 5-minute sample |
| Ready to fix own errors | Self-monitoring and home | Opportunities: errors caught out of 5 |
Goals for hearing and noticing final sounds
- When a puppet says 10 words with and without the ending (such as "ca" and cat), Nia will say whether the puppet said it right in 8 of 10 across 2 sessions. Baseline: 4 of 10. Template.
- Given 10 minimal-pair picture sets (bee and beet, toe and toad), Nia will point to the picture the SLP names in 9 of 10 trials. Baseline: 5 of 10. Template.
- Given 12 pictures, Omar will sort words into "has an ending" and "no ending" groups after the SLP says each word, in 10 of 12 across 2 sessions. Baseline: 6 of 12. Template.
- After hearing a recording of 10 of his own words, Omar will say whether each ending was there and agree with the SLP on 8 of 10. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template.
Weak: "Nia will improve auditory discrimination of final sounds." Measurable: The first goal in this section. It names the task, the number of words and the criterion.
Goals for final sounds in single words
- With a hand cue that "closes" the word, Leo will imitate the final consonant in 16 of 20 words after a model across 3 sessions. Baseline: 5 of 20. Template.
- Given 20 untrained picture words ending in a stop or /s/, Nia will say the final consonant in 16 of 20 words across 2 consecutive probes. Baseline: 4 of 20. Template.
- Given 15 consonant-vowel-consonant words (such as hat, mop and bed), Leo will close each word with the final sound in 12 of 15 words across 3 sessions. Baseline: 3 of 15. Template.
- Given 10 vowel-consonant words (such as up, eat and on), Leo will say the final sound in 8 of 10 words across 3 sessions. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template.
- Given 20 picture words ending in /s/ or /z/ (such as bus and nose), Omar will keep the ending in 16 of 20 words. Baseline: 5 of 20. Template.
Weak: "Leo will produce final consonants with 80% accuracy." Measurable: The second goal in this section. It says which endings, how many words, and that the words are untrained.
Minimal pair goals for meaning
Minimal pairs make the ending matter. When the child says "bee" for beet and the listener hands over the bee, the child sees that the ending carries meaning.
- During a minimal-pair game with 10 pairs, Nia will say the word clearly enough that the SLP picks the right picture in 8 of 10 turns across 3 sessions. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template.
- When the listener picks the wrong picture, Nia will say the word again with the ending in 4 of 5 breakdowns across 3 sessions. Baseline: 0 of 5. Template.
- Given 10 three-word sets that differ only in the ending (bee, beet, bead), Omar will name each picture so a listener picks it correctly in 8 of 10 sets. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template.
- Given 20 words in a 2-week cycle on final /p/ and /t/, Leo will say the ending in 14 of 20 untrained probe words at the end of the cycle. Baseline: 3 of 20. Template.
Weak: "Nia will use minimal pairs." Measurable: The first goal in this section. Minimal pairs are the method; the goal is the listener choosing the right word.
Phrase, song and sentence goals
- Using the carrier phrase "I see a ___," Omar will say the target word with its ending in 17 of 20 phrases across 2 sessions. Baseline: 7 of 20. Template.
- During 3 familiar songs or chants with marked target words, Leo will keep the endings in 8 of 10 target words across 3 sessions. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template.
- When describing 10 pictures in a 3 to 5 word sentence, Nia will keep the final consonant in 8 of 10 target words. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template.
- While reading 10 short decodable sentences, Omar will keep the endings in 16 of 20 marked words across 3 sessions. Baseline: 8 of 20. Template.
Weak: "Omar will use final sounds in sentences." Measurable: The first goal in this section, which names the phrase and the denominator.
Play, class and peer goals
- During a 5-minute play routine with the SLP, Leo will say final consonants in 70% of target words on 2 of 3 monthly samples. Baseline: 20%. Template.
- During class sharing time, Nia will keep the endings in 7 of 10 target words, noted by the teacher or SLP, on 3 of 4 weekly checks. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template.
- During a board game with a classmate, Omar will keep the endings in 8 of 10 target words on 3 of 4 observations. Baseline: 4 of 10. Template.
- In a 50-word play sample, Leo will raise his percent consonants correct from 52% to 70% by the annual review. Baseline: 52%. Template.
Weak: "Leo will use final consonants in all settings." Measurable: The second goal in this section. It names the routine, the scorer and the schedule.
Self-monitoring and home goals
- During structured conversation, Omar will catch and fix a missing ending in 3 of 5 errors across 3 sessions. Baseline: 0 of 5. Template.
- With a family member, Nia will name the week's 10 target words with endings at home on 4 of 5 days, logged on a home sheet, for 6 weeks. Baseline: no home practice. Template.
- For a child learning English and Spanish, Leo will use final consonants allowed in each language in 7 of 10 target words per language during play. Baseline: 3 of 10 in each. Template.
Weak: "Omar will self-monitor his speech." Measurable: The first goal in this section. It sets the number of errors and the setting.
How to measure final consonant deletion
Score each target word as ending present, ending deleted, or ending replaced (such as a glottal stop for /t/). A replaced ending often comes before a correct one, so track it separately. One probe of 20 untrained words every 2 weeks is enough for a word-level goal. Use the opportunity trial data sheet and mark the error code in each box.
For play and class goals, record 5 minutes and count every word that should end in a consonant. Report the percent of those words with the ending. For a whole-picture measure, percent consonants correct in a 50 to 100 word sample shows change across all sounds at once. The opportunities measurement guide covers prompted versus independent responses.
Here is how one probe series might look for the untrained word goal: 4 of 20 in September, 9 of 20 in November, 13 of 20 in January. That is steady progress, and the endings are starting to appear in play. The speech therapy data collection guide shows the full session routine.
Final consonants also carry grammar. Plural -s, past tense -ed and possessive -s all sit at the end of a word. If grammar markers are missing once the speech pattern clears, look at expressive language goals.
Short-term objectives
Step through the levels with steady criteria. For the untrained word goal: by the first report, imitate endings in 16 of 20 words with a cue. By the second, say endings in 12 of 20 untrained words. By the third, the annual target of 16 of 20. The guide to breaking a goal into objectives explains the format.
Adapting by age
| Age or grade | What changes | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Age 3 | Play probes, 10 words, early endings like /p/ and /m/ | Puppet and hand cue goals |
| Age 4 to 5 | Minimal pairs, cycles, songs | Minimal pair and song goals |
| Kindergarten | Sentences, decodable reading, sharing time | Reading and class sharing goals |
| Grade 1 and up | Self-monitoring, grammar endings | Catch and fix goal, then a language goal |
Final consonant deletion often comes with fronting or cluster reduction. For a plan across several patterns, see phonological processes IEP goals. All 40 templates are on the phonological processes goals page, and the goal checker flags a missing denominator.
Frequently asked questions
Is final consonant deletion a phonological process or an articulation error?
It is usually a phonological process, because the child leaves off a whole class of sounds at the ends of words, even sounds they can say at the start. Treat it as a pattern and work on the contrast rather than one sound at a time.
Which final consonants should I target first?
Start with endings the child already says at the start of words, often /p/, /t/, /m/ or /n/. Early stops and nasals give quick wins. Add fricatives such as /s/ once the child closes words reliably.
Can a bilingual child show final consonant deletion without a disorder?
Yes. If the home language allows few final consonants, dropping English endings can be a normal part of learning English. Check the pattern in both languages. A disorder shows up as errors in the home language too.
Use it in IEP Atlas
- Phonological processes goals (speech language)
- Phonological process in the IEP glossary
- Intelligibility goal hub
- Opportunity trial data sheet
- IEP goal checker
Related guides
- Articulation goals examples: sound by sound, with data methods
- Consonant cluster IEP goals: 16 examples with a scoring plan
- Fronting IEP goals: 20 examples for /k/ and /g/
- Phonological processes IEP goals: stopping, gliding, cluster reduction
Sources
- Children's English Consonant Acquisition in the United States: A Review (Crowe and McLeod, 2020), American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, via PubMed
- Speech Sound Disorders: Articulation and Phonology, ASHA
- Multilingual Service Delivery in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, ASHA
Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.